I was doing research for my current paper on Feminist Poststructuralism in scientific methodology. I agree entirely with all standing criticisms of certain scientific practices, but I was hesitant on agreeing with the alternatives many feminist epistemologists suggested. For instance, how can reflexive science truly help evolve scientific practices when the researchers' knowledge is a result of the contexts in which they were raised? Alternatively, does reflexive science combine with diversified voices to create simply a relative truth that is not discriminatory towards minorities? For instance, a diverse group of researchers create and publish a finding, and the finding is true because it equally represent voices of the world?
コメント